This post celebrates the second annual C.S. Lewis Reading Day, spearheaded by David, Matt, and Andrew over at Pints with Jack. As I did last year, let me take a moment to congratulate to all of the societies, podcasts and YouTubers, participating in the Reading Day in commemoration of Lewis' birthday. May your efforts be successful in bringing God into a world suffering from famine. A famine which where hunger is not for bread or thirst for water, but for hearing the words of God (Amos 8:11).
In aligning this post with the themes of the day, I will discuss one of my favorite Lewis quotes, and specifically one related to friendship (David mentioned this caveat on the Pints for Jack podcast, though I don't see it on the Reading Day website). I've already discussed this particular quote here on Torah from Narnia, but, as I did in last year's Reading Day post, I'll make this discussion about it a little more personal.
In the Spring of 2020, I published an article in the Jewish periodical Tradition called "Four Facets of the Love of God." The article concretized ideas I had been considering on how to approach the command/theological imperative to love God. The main thesis was that one may approach loving God in several ways, for example, as a lover (an approach well documented in the bible), as a friend, as a parent, and so on. To define these different methods of love, I turned to the definitions given in C. S. Lewis' "The Four Loves."
Shortly after the article was published, Tradition invited me to speak about my article and more broadly about Lewis with R' Mark Gottlieb. That discussion can be found here, and I thank R' Gottlieb for the opportunity to present my thoughts on Judaism and the writings of Lewis to a broader audience. Little did I know that the audience would not be entirely of Jews, but that one, David Bates, would hear this conversation. And so, in June of 2020, I received an email from David inviting me on to Pints with Jack.
I have to admit, I was rather surprised to receive David's email. First, because I could not believe that someone would just randomly find my conversation with R' Gottlieb, and second, because I never really thought about a wider readership of C. S. Lewis. Reading Lewis was something I did and maybe a few people I knew had read The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. Sure, I guess if I would have thought about it, I would have realized that there must be Christian readers of Lewis, but I never thought about it and I certainly never dreamed the existence of Christian readers of Lewis would somehow touch me.
After receiving David's email, I first went to see whether this was legit, and I listened to a bunch of Pints with Jack podcast episodes. I thought about it and discussed with my wife and kids, and of course I said yes. For those who follow Pints with Jack, I made my first appearance on the podcast in season 5 as part of Ecumenism month. I made a second appearance in season 6 to discuss "A Hebraic Inkling," and God willing, will appear again this season to discuss Joy Davidman's, "Smoke on the Mountain."
My first time on the podcast, David asked me why I was attracted to Lewis, given my obvious theological disagreements, and I think the answer I ended up giving was that I appreciate serious attempts to strive for truth. There's more than that, of course. Lewis is an excellent writer, and insightful about the modern and post-modern world. But the strive for truth, and the opportunity for me to than clearly identify what I agree and disagree with, is what brings me to the quote for this year's Reading Day:
Has not one of the poets said that a noble friend is the best gift and a noble enemy the next best?
The speaker of this line is the Calormen, Emeth, who is literally named for truth. Thus, we must apply his words to the concept of truth. A noble friend is the best gift for he will teach you truth. But a noble enemy is the next best, because he will force you to defend what you believe is true and thus test to see whether it is true or not.
Our Sages worded the same concept as follows (Avot 5:17)
Every dispute that is for the sake of Heaven, will in the end endure; But one that is not for the sake of Heaven, will not endure. Which is the controversy that is for the sake of Heaven? Such was the controversy of Hillel and Shammai. And which is the controversy that is not for the sake of Heaven? Such was the controversy of Korah and all his congregation.
Disputes for the sake of Heaven are those where both sides strive for truth. While disputes not for the sake of Heaven are those in which each side is looking out for only themselves.
In some ways, I feel my presence in this world of non-Jewish theology puts me in the role of (hopefully) noble enemy. And I am inspired and so appreciative of the positive reception I have received. I'm coming with postulates that reject what others must take as a given. My goal in participating is not to promote Judaism, but to evangelize for investing time, effort, expense, and emotion, for the One God. All of mankind is created in the image of God. This fact assures, enables, and demands that every individual can and must have a relationship with Him.
In the United States, C.S. Lewis Reading Day this year is on the day after Thanksgiving, a day in which we give thanks to our friends and family, and especially God Himself for the generosity He has bestowed upon us this year. Thus, today is the day for the next step. To go beyond simply acknowledging His presence and support, to actively working to fulfill His wishes and commands. And to look around, there are Sara Smith's in your vicinity - some are enemies some are friends. Both will help you along your journey, and we will return next Reading Day, to find ourselves raised and enlightened in the ways of God.
No comments:
Post a Comment