Narnian Ba'alei Teshuva: Eustace (Part 4)

We’ve spent the past few posts discussing Eustace’s transformation from “an ass” to a hero of Narnia. The climax of this transformation is the undressing of his dragon shell by Aslan and his subsequent baptism in the mountain well. A priori, this scene is based on the verses in Ezekiel (11:19 and 36:26) in which God says he will remove the people’s hearts of stone and replace them with hearts of flesh. Only then will they be able to return to following in God’s ways. Similarly, Eustace the dragon cannot undress himself. Aslan must do it. Eustace recalls that Aslan first makes a tear, “so deep that I thought it had gone right into my heart,” and after his baptism Eustace transforms back into a boy.

There is, however, a reversal of chronology between Ezekiel and Eustace. In Ezekiel the people have sinned, they have not repented. God’s intervention enables the people to follow God’s ways and save His Name from desecration. The people themselves have no desire to repent, God must spur them to do so.

Perhaps surprisingly then, the actual parallel to God’s ‘heart transplant’ is not Eustace un-becoming a dragon, but Eustace becoming a dragon! As a dragon Eustace changes his ways. As a dragon Eustace perceives the wrong he has done. As a dragon Eustance follows the ways of a true repentant as outlined by Maimonides. Had Eustace been transformed back into a boy without meeting Aslan all evidence suggests he would have remained a penitent and, with the guidance of his cousins, Caspian, and Reepicheep, would have come to recognize Aslan. So, why have the meeting in the first place?

In our last post I suggested that perhaps this differentiated (Lewis’) Christianity and (my) Judaism. Lewis requires a repentant to have a direct encounter with God before full acceptance into the faith. I don’t believe Judaism has such a demand. Of course, one cannot be a religious Jew without recognizing God. However, the inspiration and path to becoming religious need not be a particularly direct revelation from God. Rather, the path may traverse tradition and history, or even nature and science.

Eustace's return was catalyzed by his transformation into a dragon. His subsequent path towards God was not due to direct revelation but by his understanding the good in helping others. He looked outwards from himself and eventually that would bring him back to God. Lewis provides Eustace with an (unnecessary in my mind) shortcut via revelation from Aslan. 

Narnian Ba'alei Teshuva: Eustace (Part 3)

Eustace’s transformation from a dragon back into a boy is, without question, a quintessential moment of spiritual cleansing modeled after the verse “And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh” (Ezekiel 36:26). However, it is as a dragon that Eustace becomes a repentant. True, he has not yet apologized for his misdeeds (a necessary step in attaining forgiveness for sins between man and his fellow), but already as a dragon his character changes significantly. “It was, however, clear to everyone that Eustace's character had been rather improved by becoming a dragon. He was anxious to help.”

Actually, it is as a dragon that Eustace follows the way of a repentant. In our last post on Eustace, we quoted the ways of repentance outlined by Maimonides. Here they are in his words (translated to English):

Among the ways of repentance are, for the penitent to continue to cry out in tearful supplication before the Name, to bestow alms according to his means, and to distance himself exceedingly from the thing wherein he sinned, to have his identity changed, as if saying: "I am now another person, and not that person who perpetrated those misdeeds", to completely change his conduct for the good and straight path, and to exile himself from his place of residence, for exile atones iniquity, because it leads him to submissiveness and to be meek and humble-spirited.

Let’s see how Eustace follows (more or less) these ways:

1. “Cry out in tearful supplication” - Eustace cries when first meeting his comrades as a dragon
2. “To bestow alms according to his means” - Eustace brings back many goat and swine carcasses as provisions for the ship
3. “To distance himself exceedingly from the thing wherein he sinned” - Eustace was ashamed to be with others against whom he had sinned
4. “To have his identity changed” - Eustace was transformed into a dragon
5. “Change his conduct for the good and straight path” - Eustace's character had been rather improved by becoming a dragon
6. “Exile himself from his place of residence” - Eustace is exiled from England into the world of Narnia

And so, partly via a change of heart and partly due to events that were outside of his control, Eustace follows Maimonides’ ways of repentance.

This leaves us a bit of a quandary. While a dragon Eustace is already acting like a penitent. Were the spell such that the moment Eustace repented he would be immediately transformed back into a boy, he would have transformed and become a different, and better, boy. But that’s not what happens, first Eustace needs to meet Aslan. Why?

I wonder if it is here that Judaism and Christianity part ways. Given that all of what we do depends on God's help. Still, how much direct intervention from God is necessary? Was Aslan's direct intervention necessary to change Eustace's heart? It doesn't appear that way. Eustace could have been an evil dragon. He could have sought revenge against Edmund, Caspian, and Reepicheep. But he doesn't because he realizes the error of his ways.

He could get even with Caspian and Edmund now. But the moment he thought this he realized that he didn't want to. He wanted to be friends. He wanted to get back among humans and talk and laugh and share things. He realized that he was a monster cut off from the whole human race. An appalling loneliness came over him. He began to see that the others had not really been fiends at all. He began to wonder if he himself had been such a nice person as he had always supposed.

All of this is done without direct intervention by Aslan.

In fact, in Ezekiel, God's intervention allows for a change of heart.  Aslan's direct intervention comes after Eustace's change of heart. 

We'll explore this further in our next post. 

Narnian Ba'alei Teshuva: Eustace (Part 2)

The conversion of Eustace comes on Dragon Island. It is there that Eusatce is transformed into a dragon and then de-dragonned by Aslan himself. However, we have a glimpse of an improved Eustace even before this fateful encounter.

The Dawn Treader lands on Dragon Island on the heels of almost two weeks of violent storms. The storms have left the Dawn Treader a “crippled discolored hulk” and already immediately upon landing a huge amount of work needed to be done. Eustace, of course, is not interested in participating and decides to sneak off to a place in the mountains to rest. The climb was not an easy one but he plugged away.

It is here that Lewis makes the following remark:

This showed, by the way, that his new life, little as he suspected it, had already done him some good; the old Eustace, Harold and Alberta's Eustace, would have given up the climb after about ten minutes.

In other words, Eustace’s process towards conversion had already begun. How? What was it that made him no longer the “old Eustace”?

Maimonides (Teshuva 2:4) (based on the Talmud) outlines the paths towards repentance. The last is that the repentant is exiled from his place. Maimonides explains that exile causes someone to be humble and low of spirit. Eustace was certainly exiled from his home to a land he could have even imagined. However, it does not appear he has been very humbled. In fact, his pride shows through even after the end of the storm when attempts to steal water.

Still, Eustace does undergo some humiliating experiences. He is publicly chastised by Caspian for stealing water, and is demonstrably not trusted by Caspian and the crew of the Dawn Treader. His hand is skewered by Reepicheep. He is offered as a slave and no one wants him (a scenario described as the final curse in the rebuke section of Deutoronomy 28:68). Perhaps these experiences left him with more humility and hence more resilience in the face of the obstacles.

Furthermore, Eustace has, if even by osmosis, been experiencing “the right kind of books.” He has heard stories of adventure and courage, of bravery and honor. Perhaps some of this has seeped into his unconscious. Or, perhaps it is simply the hardships he has suffered (and he has certainly suffered) that just gave him greater strength to overcome adversity.

In Screwtape Proposes a Toast, Screwtape (a senior demon) asserts, “The great (and tooth-some) sinners are made out of the very same material as those horrible phenomena, the great Saints.” In Eustace, the first step towards repentance is not, cannot be to make him a saint. The first step is to grow the material. True, the material can be used for sin (would the old Eustace have been brave enough to steal water in the first place?). But that material can be transformed for good. And the suffering, embarrassment, and environment experienced on the Dawn Treader moves begins this growth.

Narnian Ba'alei Teshuva: Eustace (Part 1)

There was a boy called Eustace Clarence Scrubb, and he almost deserved it

The second great penitent of the Narnian Chronicles is Eustace Clarence Scrubb. We are introduced to Eustace, the cousin of the four Pevensie children, at the very beginning of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader:

There was a boy called Eustace Clarence Scrubb, and he almost deserved it… He didn't call his Father and Mother "Father" and "Mother", but Harold and Alberta. They were very up-to-date and advanced people. They were vegetarians, non-smokers and teetotallers and wore a special kind of underclothes.

Lewis’ disgust with Eustace and the environment in which he was raised is immediately obvious.

Continuing further in the first chapter we find that Eustace never read the right kind of books (he read books with information, not of adventure and fantasy), that deep-down he liked bullying people, and had little imagination. In The Silver Chair we learn that he would constantly curry favor and dance attendance for the school bullies.

Eustace’s behavior on the Dawn Treader reflects his upbringing and personality. He views himself as far superior to others, he is impossible to satisfy, and he is quick to point out what’s wrong in any situation but refuses any attempt to solve anything. Borrowing from our previous definitions, we would say he is the very opposite of valiant.

Despite these very negative characteristics it would be a stretch to say Eustace is evil. He is stuck-up, immature, a whiner (kvetch), and a spoiled brat, but not evil. In fact, in his own eyes he’s a pretty good guy. This point is underscored by contrasting Eustace with Edmund. In fact, it is Edmund himself who makes the contrast: “Between ourselves, you haven't been as bad as I was on my first trip to Narnia. You were only an ass, but I was a traitor.”

One might think being an ass rather than a traitor would make penitence easier for Eustace than it was for Edmund. Via Screwtape, Lewis tells us this is not so, “The great (and tooth- some) sinners are made out of the very same material as those horrible phenomena, the great Saints.” To turn from sinner to saint one needs a change of direction. But how does one create a saint from a soul that is small and flabby (paraphrasing Screwtape)? From those whose minds are so muddled they do not understand the source of character of the prohibitions they are breaking? And indeed, at the beginning of the Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Eustace considers himself a good person who tries to help others by showing them the facts.

How does one resurrect such a soul?

Narnian Ba'alei Teshuva: Caspian the Tenth

Prince Caspian (the second book of the Chronicles of Narnia, if one is following the proper order) contains a number of stories of spiritual renewal and teshuva. We will first quickly consider King Caspian the Tenth who is brought up in the darkness of Telmarine society, and awakens to its vacuity upon learning of the true origin and destiny of Narnia. Other such stories in Prince Caspian include that of Trumpkin the dwarf who repents his denial of the existence of Aslan, and even Susan repents for her initial doubts of Lucy’s visions.

While perhaps not enlightening concerning the characters themselves, we find it valuable to compare and contrast Caspian with the most outstanding repentant in the Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Eustace Clarence Scrubb. Both Caspian and Eustace are raised by skeptics. Caspian by his uncle Miraz and Eustace by his parents Harold and Alberta. Miraz outlawed the teaching of, and even the mention of, earlier Narnian history which by his time had retreated to myths and legends. He doubted the existence of lions and talking beasts and scoffed at the idea of a joint rule between brothers and sisters. Eustace, of course, is raised by Harold and Alberta who were “very up-to-date and advanced people.” So advanced and up to date that they leave Eustace with no imagination and little ability to dream.

There is, however, a major factor that differentiates the two. Caspian has a nurse who tells him stories of the olden days while Eustace has none. It appears that it is for this reason, that when confronted with Old Narnia, Caspian immediately is on board and supports them over his fellow Telmarines. When Eustace is confronted with Narnia he doesn’t know what to think. In fact, he’s quite sure it’s all a ruse and only a tortuous and painful procedure teaches him to think otherwise. We will return to Eustace later, but let’s spend a short amount of time on King Caspian the Seafarer, Tenth of that name.

How does Caspian, the boy everyone thought would be the next leader of the Telmarines in Narnina, morph into the champion of Old Narnia? What process allowed him to abandon his own people’s morality and ethics for that of (what is effectively) a foreign culture. The answer is, the stories of his nurse. Those stories made a far deeper impression on the young Caspian than all of his later studies in history, cosmography, and heraldry. Those stories remained alive within Caspian even as his nurse was dismissed and Dr. Cornelius took her place, and, under his tutelage the stories were transformed into history, ethics, and theology. Thus, it is the nurse and the tutor who gain the trust of the young Caspian and shape his worldview from that of a typical aristocratic Telmarine, into that of a savior for Old Narnia.

It is interesting to note a possible parallel between Caspian and Moses, the greatest of all prophets. Both were raised in the castle of the enemy of the Chosen People. Both were taught of the true worth of the downtrodden and what would be their glorious end: Caspian by his nurse and Moses either by his nursemaid (his genetic mother) or his adopted mother the daughter of the Pharaoh. Both run from the castle as they are likely to be sentenced for death, and reemerge as the champion for those downtrodden people they were taught to respect. Both initially doubted the success of their ultimate goal but were convinced to take on their leadership position. Finally, both were turned away from their Promised Land, Moses on the banks of the Jordan and Caspian at the edge of the Silver Sea.

What catalyzed Caspian? What propelled him to go to war with a band of woodland creatures against a great national power? The stories of his nurse. Stories are powerful, stories allow children to dream and adults to strive to reach those dreams. So, in our next post we will take a quick detour to explore the storyteller: Caspian’s nurse, or perhaps, C. S. Lewis.

Narnian Astronomy: The Purpose of the Stars

“In our world,” said Eustace, “a star is a huge ball of flaming gas.”

“Even in your world, my son, that is not what a star is but only what it is made of…”

(The Voyage of the Dawn Treader)

Humanity’s relationship to the stars has evolved significantly over the millenium. Certainly, the scientific approach of the past few centuries has offered us great insight into what a star “is made of” based on mechanics, electromagnetism, astronomy, cosmology, nuclear and particle physics. Nonetheless, the pre-scientific perspective of our ancestors may provide more insight into what a star is, rather than what it is made of.

Maimonides asserts that the awe felt by early man when looking at the Heavens, led them to idol worship. At the time of Enosh (Adam’s grandson) humanity reasoned as follows. God created the stars to guide our world, and honored them by placing them in the heavens to serve Him. Therefore, we too should praise and honor the stars. After all, were a king to appoint an officer, it would be the king’s will that the people honor the officer. So too, since God appointed the stars as his officer’s, we who honor God should honor the stars. As time went by, however, false prophets arose telling people that God had commanded them to bring sacrifices and perform service to the various stars. As the service to the stars became even more ingrained, false prophets arose saying that a particular star had come to him and is requiring from man a specific type of worship. This continued until eventually the true God was completely forgotten.

The concept introduced at the time of Enosh, that the stars who serve God should themselves be honored, led to a slippery slope that, at its nadir, resulted in total ignorance of the true God. Yet, without question, God did create the stars, sun, and planets. Was this done directly to serve Him or are these heavenly bodies created to serve man?

The creation story in the first chapter of Genesis records the creation of the sun, moon, and stars on the fourth day. The rationale given for the creation of the sun and the moon is, (Genesis 1:14-15) “To separate the day from the night; and they should be as signs for set times, and for days and years. And they should be sources of light in the sky to shine upon the earth.” From this description it would seem that the sun and moon were created as timepieces and luminaries to serve (as of yet created) man. Upon actual creation the verse also notes that these luminous bodies (and the stars) dominate or rule over the day and the night. There is no hint that they were created to serve God.

The Psalmist, however, explicitly calls to the sun, moon and stars (as well as the rest of creation) to sing in praise of God. 

Praise Him all of His angels; Praise Him all of His Host
Praise Him sun and moon; Praise Him all stars of light
Praise Him highest of heavens, and the water that is above the heavens (Psalms 148:2-4)

From the Psalm it certainly appears that the stars and other Heavenly bodies do sing praises to God. Perhaps there is a way we can synthesize these two approaches...

Narnian Astronomy: What Stars are Made Of

“In our world,” said Eustace, “a star is a huge ball of flaming gas.”

“Even in your world, my son, that is not what a star is but only what it is made of…”

(The Voyage of the Dawn Treader)

Throughout the Chronicles we learn much about the Narnian stars. The stars of Narnia were grouped into constellations such as the Leopard and the Ship. They sing the music of the spheres which, at the dawn of creation, was audible to man and beast. The dance of the Stars as they traverse the upper sky also indicates coming events, and their message could be divined by centaurs and other creatures wise in astrology. Perhaps most importantly we learn that Narnian stars are sentient beings who can take on human form.

In “The Voyage of the Dawn Treader” the crew and passengers on the Dawn Treader meet two stars in their human form. Due to what he perceives as a sharp contrast between our world and the Narnian one, Eustace demonstrates particular surprise upon realizing that what he perceived as a human was actually a star. “In our world,” said Eustace, “a star is a huge ball of flaming gas.” Stars in our world are not alive, they do not think, and they do not sing to their Creator as the star Ramandu (now in human form) certainly does.

However, Ramandu, speaking for Lewis, disagrees. “Even in your world, my son, that is not what a star is but only what it is made of…” A star is made of flaming gas, but that does not speak to its essence. This assertion raises the obvious question: if, in Lewis’ view, a star is only composed of flaming gas but that does not actually define its nature, what is a star?

We will return to this question in the next post.